Role G7+ To Observe The 2023 General Election In Guinea-Bissau: A Case Study In Region 2 (Bissau And Biombo)
Keywords:
g7+ role, general election, guinea bissauAbstract
This study examines the role of the G7+ intergovernmental organization in observing the 2023 General Elections in Guinea-Bissau, with a particular focus on Region 2 (Bissau and Biombo). The capacity of election officials to perform their supervisory functions is central to the integrity of democratic processes; key challenges identified in this context include inadequate facilities, limited human resources, and insufficient oversight from hierarchical leadership structures. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of G7+’s electoral observation mandate in Guinea-Bissau in 2023. A descriptive qualitative research methodology was employed, utilizing primary and secondary data gathered through interviews, observations, and documentation. Despite these limitations, the 2023 General Elections proceeded in accordance with established electoral regulations, with active participation from both national and international observers. The G7+ observation team monitored 68 voting centers across 7 constituencies in Region 2 and documented a high level of public trust in the electoral process. The study concludes that strengthening the institutional capacity of G7+ is essential for ensuring more effective electoral oversight in fragile post-conflict states.
References
Ahmad, M., & Wilkins, S. (2025). Purposive sampling in qualitative research: a framework for the entire journey. Quality & Quantity, 59(2), 1461–1479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5
Arthur, P. (2025). Countering the Wave of Democratic Backsliding and the Crisis of Democracy in West Africa. Insight on Africa, 17(2), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/09750878241312188
Blair, R. A., Di Salvatore, J., & Smidt, H. M. (2023). UN Peacekeeping and Democratization in Conflict-Affected Countries. American Political Science Review, 117(4), 1308–1326. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422001319
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
Fjelde, H., & Smidt, H. M. (2022). Protecting the Vote? Peacekeeping Presence and the Risk of Electoral Violence. British Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 1113–1132. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123421000132
Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
Higashijima, M., & Kerr, N. (2023). When Does the Honeymoon End? Electoral Cycles of Satisfaction With Democracy in Africa. Political Psychology, 44(4), 709–728. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12878
Ikoko, M. O., & Latif, D. (2025). Analysis of factors impacting electoral integrity in Africa between 2006–2023 - Examining the association between free and fair election and rule of law. PLOS One, 20(10), e0334505. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0334505
Jochem, T., Murtazashvili, I., & Murtazashvili, J. (2020). Can the Design of Electoral Institutions Improve Perceptions of Democracy in Fragile States? Evidence from Afghanistan. Journal of Global Security Studies, 5(3), 443–462. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogz020
Kerr, N., & Wahman, M. (2021). Electoral Rulings and Public Trust in African Courts and Elections. Comparative Politics, 53(2), 257–290. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041521X15930293747844
Lee, M. M. (2022). International Statebuilding and the Domestic Politics of State Development. Annual Review of Political Science, 25(1), 261–281. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-110830
Mauk, M. (2021). Quality of Democracy Makes a Difference, but Not for Everyone: How Political Interest, Education, and Conceptions of Democracy Condition the Relationship Between Democratic Quality and Political Trust. Frontiers in Political Science, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.637344
Mochtak, M., Lesschaeve, C., & Glaurdić, J. (2021). Voting and winning: perceptions of electoral integrity in consolidating democracies. Democratization, 28(8), 1423–1441. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.1918111
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Revisi). https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=id&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Moleong%2C+L.+J.+%282017%29.+Metodologi+penelitian+kualitatif+%28Edisi+revisi%29.+PT+Remaja+Rosdakarya&btnG=
Morrison, K., Donno, D., Savun, B., & Davutoglu, P. (2025). Competing judgments: Multiple election observers and post-election contention. The Review of International Organizations, 20(2), 293–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-023-09528-x
Muhr, T. (2023). Reclaiming the politics of South-South cooperation. Globalizations, 20(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2022.2082132
Okeke, R. C., Idike, A. N., Akwara, A. F., Okorie, C. O., & Ibiam, O. E. (2021). Failure of States, Fragility of States, and the Prospects of Peace in South Sudan. Sage Open, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211020483
SD Hyde. (2020). Democracy’s backsliding in the international environment. Science.OrgSD HydeScience, 2020•science.Org. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.ABB2472
Smidt, H. (2021). Keeping electoral peace? Activities of United Nations peacekeeping operations and their effects on election-related violence. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 38(5), 580–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894220960041
Soukolgué, B. (2023). Mitigating the impact of democratic recession through electoral assistance in Africa. South African Journal of International Affairs, 30(3), 555–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2023.2276369
von Borzyskowski, I., Daxecker, U., & Kuhn, P. M. (2022). Fear of campaign violence and support for democracy and autocracy. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 39(5), 542–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/07388942211026319
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Oriental Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.